I can just imagine the enemy team setting up a blockade at one point, building up sentries etc..
I can also imagine a few sentries mounted on the cart. This one sounds very original and entertaining.
Sounds like a c0ck up.
3 to 1? I thought the Wii was selling PS3's 10 to one not that long ago..?
Atleast we (you and the public) can agree on one thing.
It's called putting money before service..
As if their turn over is that much..
Give me two billion and a year and I'll build you google v2.00
If so, ditch that BT/Virgin/Sky connection..
Ah: Profile: North America. That's a bummer..
<fanboy>
The PS3 took 10% drop while the 360 only took 9% drop, in another 15.5 months, the 360 will be outselling the PS3 at this rate..
Ha, it's only a matter of time..
</fanboy>
My grandma could do that..
Nokia killer? Now, that would be impressive.
Totally agreed with you there.. I hate foul mouthed racists and go out of my way to make sure they get my negative feedback before I mute them..
I'm sure Sony will sort this one when they get in-game live stuff sorted out.
Firstly, disagreeing with your comment isn't about disagreeing with what's being said in the main article, It's your interpretation, your attempt at highlighting certain elements and your attempt at making the PS3 approach seem better.
We need a half-way house. I want the stuff that's downloaded and checked, I don't want to wade through loads of stuff, trying out stuff after stuff until I find something that is actually good.
However, if it's something that has to ...
If a team of people work hard developping something for a year or so and someone copies their work and sells it, making money from it, how much should they be fined?
I think you'll find this is an 'upto' limit, this is probably just to get around scenarios where a copier has got off lightly and actually profited from the crime.
Saw the demo running on a naff PC the other night and yes, all the settings were low etc., and the frame rate was choppy, but the game still looked good and the physics were awesome. It can only be alot better on the consoles from what I saw the other night.
Retailers typically get around 30% margin (or used to), they have decided to mark the PS3 version higher because maybe they expect to sell less units.. Either way, they are not helping themselves.
They obviously realised that something was eating bandwidth.. Dopey as they are, maybe they thought it was some kind of a DOS attack?
I didn't know UMD was ever an 'undoomed' format.
it's a game. Are books censored in the same way? What about all the films that are out there.. erm.. what about music?
Yes, I realise this is interactive, but heck I've not had the urge to go on a rampage.. or has that something to do with the fact that I never actually completed GTA3? :->
looking for some hard evidence? huh?
And if this doesn't work wonders for hits, then there is always the PS3 vs Xbox 360 flame bait.. somewhere..
If a company takes an 80gb machine out of service, surely it's to make room for a larger capacity one.
Why company on earth would shrink disk space capacity???
btw: That was my disagree in error. Yes, you're right, most people wouldn't know or want to open up their ps3. And yes, they should bring back backward compatibility..
by lesbian aliens. :-)